Advancing a Restraint-Focused Cyber Strategy in the Indo-Pacific (Marcellus Policy Analysis)

By Joseph Brennan, Spring 2025 Marcelus Policy Fellow The Indo-Pacific is becoming the strategic hotspot of global competition where cyber power converges with increased geopolitical tensions, particularly between China and the United States. With digital technology embedded into military strategy, economic infrastructure, and everyday lives, cyberspace emerged as the area of contention and collaboration. The […]

Read More…

A New Strategy for NATO (Marcellus Policy Analysis)

By Corey Shiver, Spring 2025 Marcellus Policy Fellow The transatlantic relationship is at a crossroads. Currently engrossed in the transformative foreign policy of President Donald Trump, the United States and its North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) partners are consumed in debate as to how European security should be achieved. This debate on burden-sharing has created […]

Read More…

A Better US China Strategy Requires Realism in Southeast Asia (Marcellus Policy Analysis)

By Jack Erickson, Spring 2025 Marcellus Policy Fellow China’s rise during the early 21st century constitutes the most significant development in Asia since the end of World War II. Because of China’s considerable geographic, demographic, and economic size, it will prove difficult to consider American strategy in any part of Asia without respect to China […]

Read More…

A Reassessment of U.S. Freedom of Navigation Operations in the South China Sea (Marcellus Policy Analysis)

By Stockton Raso, Spring 2025 Marcellus Policy Fellow There was a time when U.S. freedom of navigation operations (FONOPs) were relatively low-key and routine operations signaling U.S. commitment to international law and the freedom of the seas. However, in the past decade, these operations in the South and East China Seas have become a topic […]

Read More…

Too Big to Succeed? Towards a Reformed AUKUS (Marcellus Policy Analysis)

By Marko Gural, Spring 2025 Marcellus Policy Fellow The United States should reform AUKUS to emphasize the partnership’s Pillar II (technology sharing) while sidelining Pillar I (transfer of U.S. nuclear-powered submarines to Australia). There are two problems with the U.S.-U.K.-Australia defense partnership. Canberra is unnecessary for a balancing coalition against China in the Indo-Pacific, as […]

Read More…

Modernizing Arms Control: The Case for Codifying Oversight in AI and Nuclear Command Policy (Marcellus Policy Analysis)

By Sofia Guerra, Fall 2024 Marcellus Policy Fellow The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into nuclear command, control, and  communications (NC3) systems presents both opportunities and risks. While AI can enhance  decision-making and operational efficiency, it also increases vulnerabilities, such as automation  bias, miscalculation risks, and compressed decision timelines. In the U.S.-China context— marked […]

Read More…

Realism and Restraint Advances America’s Interests in Latin America (Marcellus Policy Analysis)

By George Barber, Fall 2024 Marcellus Policy Fellow The new administration of President Donald Trump should not go to war in Mexico to eradicate Mexican drug cartels and stop the flow of fentanyl. The United States would be drawn into a costly and likely unwinnable war that it simply cannot afford at the current moment. […]

Read More…

We’re Rocking Boats We Can’t Sink: How a Restraint Pact with China Resolves America’s Ship-Killing Deficiency (Marcellus Policy Analysis)

By Kamsi Obiorah, Fall 2024 Marcellus Policy Fellow The “one-China” policy has been chronically invalidated by U.S. presidents over time, which has increasedthe likelihood of a future Chinese invasion of Taiwan. Instead of rashly promising to militarily defend Taiwan in battle, Washington must face the reality of its disappointing anti-ship weapons stockpile and that of […]

Read More…

Bull in the China Shop- America’s Israel Policy Harms Relations with China (Marcellus Policy Analysis)

By Garrett Ehinger, Fall 2024 Marcellus Policy Fellow Unwavering U.S. support for Israel risks destabilizing the Middle East by enabling escalatory Israeli actions, such as strikes on Iran and the invasion of Lebanon. This threatens American regional interests, including oil production and counterterrorism efforts, while also jeopardizing similar Chinese interests, such as stability for the […]

Read More…

The Red Sea Crisis: Navigating Failure and Correcting Course (Marcellus Policy Analysis)

By Chad Kunkle, Fall 2024 Marcellus Policy Fellow The crisis in the Red Sea has caused serious troubles for global trade and American prestige. The current approach towards the Houthis is failing due to the material and strategic realities that constrain U.S. policy in the Middle East, primarily that the United States has a limited […]

Read More…